Throughout the EDLD 5315 course, I explored how action research can support the measurement and continuous improvement of innovative learning environments. As I continued developing my innovation project, Tech Time: My Time in Kindergarten, this course helped me understand that meaningful innovation must be supported by intentional measurement strategies that allow educators to evaluate impact and refine their practices.
The artifacts presented in this section represent the progression of my thinking as I clarified the instructional problem, explored relevant literature, examined common misconceptions about research, and designed an action research plan to measure the effectiveness of my innovation.
Together, these artifacts demonstrate how research, reflection, and collaboration support the development of meaningful measurement strategies that help educators improve their practice and communicate their ideas effectively.
From Research to Practice: Measuring Tech Time in Action
The following presentation summarizes the key ideas that guided the development of my measurement strategy for Tech Time: My Time in Kindergarten. It highlights how structured routines, teacher guidance, and intentional observation can support the development of independence in early childhood learning environments.
Recognizing the Misperceptions
This artifact helped me understand common misconceptions about action research in education. Many educators believe that research must be complex or conducted only by external experts. However, action research empowers teachers to investigate their own practice in meaningful and practical ways. Understanding these misconceptions helped me see how action research can be used to measure the impact of classroom innovations such as Tech Time: My Time in Kindergarten, while also supporting continuous improvement in teaching and learning.
Access the Artifact
Clarifying the Problem – Collaborative Discussion
Before developing a research plan, it was important to clearly identify the instructional challenge I wanted to address. Through this collaborative discussion and the “5 Whys” process, I explored the issue of student independence when using technology in the kindergarten classroom. This reflection helped me narrow my focus and identify the need for structured technology routines that allow students to access digital learning activities more independently.
Access the Artifact
Literature Review: Measuring Tech Time in Kindergarten
The literature review allowed me to explore research related to technology integration, student engagement, and independence in early childhood learning environments. Reviewing scholarly sources helped me understand how structured digital learning experiences can support student autonomy and motivation. This research also informed the design of my action research plan by identifying key elements that should be measured, such as student engagement, task completion, and independence during technology center rotations.
Access the Artifact
Access the Artifact
EDLD 5315 – Action Research Design Outline
This artifact represents the initial design of my action research plan. In this outline, I defined the research question, data collection methods, and measurement strategies that will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of my innovation project. The research design focuses on measuring student independence and engagement during technology-based learning activities. This plan will guide the implementation of Tech Time: My Time in Kindergarten and support the collection of meaningful data that can inform instructional improvements.
The complete action research plan is also available below. In that document, the observation instruments used to collect data such as the student independence observation record and the teacher interruption log are included as supporting tools. These instruments will provide the evidence needed to determine whether structured digital routines effectively support student independence during digital learning activities. The document also includes examples of how the collected data will be organized and visually represented through charts and graphs to support data interpretation.
Throughout this school year, I have also tried to intentionally implement many of the ideas explored in this program within my classroom practice. This course reinforced an important realization for me as an educator: meaningful improvement in teaching is not something that can be improvised. Especially when working with young learners, instructional decisions must be intentional, reflective, and supported by observation. At the same time, learning should be experienced alongside students, allowing teachers and children to grow together in a process of shared discovery and enrichment.
Access the Artifacts
Contribution to My Learning and the Learning Community
Throughout this course, I actively engaged in discussions and collaborative exchanges with my peers. These interactions helped deepen my understanding of action research and allowed me to refine my ideas through feedback and reflection. Participating in the learning community strengthened my ability to connect theory and practice while developing a research-based approach to evaluating my innovation project.
Access the Artifact
Conclusion
Developing this measurement strategy helped me understand that meaningful innovation in education requires both creativity and careful reflection. Through the artifacts presented in this section, I was able to clarify the instructional problem, explore relevant research, and design an action research plan that will guide the evaluation of my innovation project, Tech Time: My Time in Kindergarten. Moving forward, this research process will allow me to intentionally observe, measure, and refine classroom practices in order to better support student independence and engagement in technology-supported learning environments.
More importantly, it strengthens my role as an educator who uses research and reflection to continuously improve learning experiences for young learners.